Author: Chad Snelson
Last saved by: Dawn Lyons

Reporting Instrument

OMB Control Number:  0985-0043
Expiration Date:  January 31, 2021

UniTed States Department of Education
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
Rehabilitation Services Administration

Section 704 
annual performance report
For
STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES PROGRAM
(Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended)

Part I

 INSTRUMENT

(To be completed by Designated State Units
And Statewide Independent Living Councils)

Reporting Fiscal Year: 2022

State: NV

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 35 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain benefit (P.L. 105-220 Section 410 Workforce Investment Act). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Rehabilitation Services Administration, LBJ Basement, Attention: Timothy Beatty, PCP Room 5057, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave, SW, Washington, DC 20202-2800 or email timothy.beatty@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1820-0606.Chapter 1, Title VII of the Rehabilitation Act.
SubPart I – Administrative DataSection A – Sources and Amounts of Funds and Resources
Sections 704(c) and 704(m)(3) and (4) of the Act; 34 CFR 364.35 and 364.36

Indicate amount received by the DSU as per each funding source.  Enter “0” for none.

Item 1 - All Federal Funds Received
(A) Title VII, Ch. 1, Part B | $338717.00
(B) Title VII, Ch. 1, Part C – For 723 states Only | $0.00
(C) Title VII, Ch. 2 | $0.00
(D) Other Federal Funds | $0.00
Subtotal - All Federal Funds | $338717.00

Item 2 - Other Government Funds 
(E) State Government Funds | $0.00
(F) Local Government Funds | $0.00
Subtotal - State and Local Government Funds | $0.00

Item 3 - Private Resources
(G) Fees for Service (program income, etc.) | $0.00
(H) Other resources | $0.00
Subtotal - Private Resources | $0.00

Item 4 - Total Income  
Total income = (A)+(B)+(C)+(D)+(E)+(F)+(G)+(H) | $338717.00

Item 5 – Pass-Through Funds
Amount of other government funds received as pass through funds to consumers (include funds, received on behalf of consumers, that are subsequently passed on to consumers, e.g., personal assistance services, representative payee funds, Medicaid funds, etc.) | $0.00

Item 6 - Net Operating Resources
[Total Income (Section 4) <minus> amount paid out to Consumers (Section 5) = Net Operating Resources | $338717.00
Section B – Distribution of Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds 

What Activities were 
Conducted with Part B Funds?

Expenditures of Part B Funds for Services by DSU Staff

Expenditures for Services Rendered By Grant or Contract

(1)	Provided resources to the SILC to carry out its functions | $99889.20 | $0.00
(2)	Provided IL services to individuals with significant disabilities | $0.00 | $140000.00
(3)	Demonstrated ways to expand and improve IL services | $0.00 | $20000.00
(4)	Supported the general operation of CILs that are in compliance with the standards and assurances set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 725 of the Act | $0.00 | $0.00
(5)	Supported activities to increase capacity to develop approaches or systems for providing IL services | $0.00 | $52501.00
(6)	Conducted studies and analyses, gathered information, developed model policies, and presented findings in order to enhance IL services | $0.00 | $0.00
(7)	Provided training regarding the IL philosophy | $1907.00 | $0.00
(8)	Provided outreach to unserved or underserved populations, including minority groups and urban and rural populations | $6795.00 | $16785.00

Section C – Grants or Contracts Used to Distribute Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds 
Sections 704(f) and 713 of the Act; 34 CFR 364.43, and 34 CFR 365 Subpart C 

Enter the requested information for all DSU grants or contracts, funded at least in part by Part B funds, in the chart below.  If a column is not applicable to a particular grant or contract, enter “N/A.”   If there were no non-Part B funds provided to this grantee or contractor for the purpose listed, enter “$0” in that column.  Add more rows as necessary

Name of Grantee or Contractor

Use of Funds
        (based on the activities listed in Subpart I, Section B)

Amount of Part B Funds

Amount of Non-Part B Funds

Consumer Eligibility Determined By 
        DSU or Provider

CSRs Kept With 
DSU or Provider

Care Chest | 2 | $140000.00 | $0.00 | Provider | DSU
Rural Center for Independent Living | 3 | $20000.00 | $0.00 | Provider | Provider
Northern Center for Independent Living | 5 | $20000.00 | $0.00 | Provider | Provider
Southern Nevada Center for Independent Living | 5 | $20000.00 | $0.00 | Provider | Provider
David Belluso | 8 | $4025.00 | $0.00 | N/A | N/A
DSE/Youth Contractor | 5 | $12501.00 | $0.00 | N/A | N/A
Community Chest | 8 | $12760.00 | $0.00 | N/A | N/A
Total Amount of Grants and Contracts | | $229286.00 | $0.00 | |

Section D - Grants or Contracts for Purposes Other than Providing IL Services or For the General Operation of Centers
Section 713 of the Act; 34 CFR 365.1 and 34 CFR 365.20

Describe the objectives, activities and results for each Part B grant or contract awarded for purposes other than IL services or the general operation of centers.  

Rural Center for Independent Living was awarded $20,000 to offer housing assistance initiatives to the disability populations of Carson, Douglas, Lyon and Churchill Counties.
                $4,025 was contracted to Davidson Belluso to maintain the SILC website. 
                A Youth Leader was contracted to further develop the Youth Action Council under the SILC for $12,501. A new laptop and equipment was provided for the Youth Leader as all SILC employees and staff are telecommuting due to the pandemic. The Youth Leader has been actively recruiting volunteers for the Council to represent youth with disabilities in Nevada.
                SILC provided the $20,000 to each Part C Center for independent Living in Nevada for scholarships to the National Council for Independent Living Conference to further educate parents and students and nurture transition services throughout the State. 
                $12,760 was awarded to Community Chest to assist the SILC in managing choice and control regarding services and supplies for SILC outreach and education. This allowed the SILC to pay for travel expenses and services that are not contracted specifically through the State. 

Section E – Monitoring Title VII, Chapter 1, Part B Funds
34 CFR 80.40(a)

Provide a summary of the program or fiscal review, evaluation and monitoring conducted by the state of any of the grantees/contractors receiving Part B funds during the reporting year.  

Davidson Belluso performed web maintenance as specified in our contract with no additional issues arising.
                
                The Youth Action Council has participated in outreach activities and holds meetings quarterly, reporting to SILC at our quarterly meetings, as well as collaborating with SILC on many initiatives in the State Plan for Independent Living.
                
                The Centers for independent Living provided quarterly updates regarding the scholarship program and consumer trends to SILC and will provide a final report in January 2023.
                
                Community Chest meets with SILC Executive Director at least quarterly to discuss SPIL progress and the needs of the SILC.
                
                The State AT/IL Program Director submitted quarterly reports to SILC and provided ongoing communication regarding program changes, service provider challenges and program wait lists.

Section F – Administrative Support Services and Staffing  
Section 704(c)(2) and 704 (m)(2) and (4) of the Act; CFR 364.22(a)(2) and 34 CFR 364.31

Item 1 – Administrative Support Services

Describe any administrative support services, including staffing, provided by the DSU to the Part B Program.

DSE provided 1.18 FTE staff support to SILC, Deputy Attorney General support, fiscal support, purchasing and records retention.

Item 2 – Staffing

Enter requested staff information for the DSU and service providers listed in Section C, above (excluding Part C funded CILs):

Type of Staff

Total Number 
of FTEs

FTEs filled by Individuals with Disabilities

Decision-Making Staff | 1.25 | 1.25
Other Staff | 1 | 1

Section G – For Section 723 States ONLY
Section 723 of the Act, 34 CFR Part 366, Subpart D

Item 1 – Distribution of Part C Funds to Centers

In the chart below, please provide the following information: 

A)	name of each center within your state that received Part C funding during the reporting year; 
B)	amount of Part C funding each center received; 
C)	whether the Part C funding included a cost-of-living increase; 
D)	whether the Part C funding included any excess funds remaining after cost-of-living increases were provided; 
E)	whether any of the centers received its Part C funding pursuant to a competition for a new center in the state; and 
F)	whether the center was the subject of an onsite compliance review conducted by the DSU during the reporting year.  

Add additional rows as necessary.

Item 2 – Administrative Support Services 
Section 704(c)(2) of the Act; 34 CFR 364.22(a)(2)

Describe the administrative support services used by the DSU to administer the Part C program.

%%1_7_1%%

Item 3 – Monitoring and Onsite Compliance Reviews
Section 723(g), (h), and (i); 34 CFR 366.38, 366.40 – 46

Provide a summary of the monitoring activities involving Part C centers conducted by the state during the current reporting year, including the onsite reviews of at least 15% of centers receiving Part C funds under section 723.  The summary should include, at least, the following:

A)	centers’ level of compliance with the standards and assurances in Section 725 of the Act; 
B)	any adverse actions taken against centers;
C)	any corrective action plans entered into with centers; and
D)	exemplary, replicable or model practices for centers.

%%1_7_2%%

Item 4 – Updates or Issues

Provide any updates to the administration of the Part C program by the DSU, if any, including any significant changes in the amount of earmarked funds or any changes in the order of priorities in the distribution of Part C funds.  Provide a description of any issues of concern addressed by the DSU in its administration of the Part C program.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

%%1_7_3%%

SubPart II – Number and Types of Individuals with significant disabilities receiving services 
Section 704(m)(4) of the Act; 34 CFR 364.53

In this section, provide data from all service providers (DSU, grantees, contractors) who received Part B funds and who were listed in Subpart I, Section C of this report, except for the centers that receive Part C funds.  Part C centers will provide this data themselves on their annual 704 Reports, Part II.

Section A – Number of Consumers Served During the Reporting Year

Include Consumer Service Records (CSRs) for all consumers served during the year.
| # of CSRs
(1)	Enter the number of active CSRs carried over from September 30 of the preceding reporting year | 216
(2)	Enter the number of CSRs started since October 1 of the reporting year | 104
(3)	Add lines (1) and (2) to get the total number of consumers served | 320

Section B –Number of CSRs Closed by September 30 of the Reporting Year

Include the number of consumer records closed out of the active CSR files during the reporting year because the individual has:
| # of CSRs
(1)	Moved | 1
(2)	Withdrawn | 14
(3)	Died | 10
(4)	Completed all goals set | 103
(5)	Other | 2
(6)	Add lines (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) +(5) to get total CSRs closed | 130
Section C –Number of CSRs Active on September 30 of the Reporting Year

Indicate the number of CSRs active on September 30^th of the reporting year.
| # of CSRs
Section A(3) <minus>  Section (B)(6) = Section C | 190

Section D – IL Plans and Waivers

Indicate the number of consumers in each category below.
| # of Consumers
(1)	Number of consumers who signed a waiver | 1
(2)	Number of consumers with whom an ILP was developed | 319
(3)	Total number of consumers served during the reporting year | 320

Section E – Age

Indicate the number of consumers in each category below.
| # of Consumers
(1)	Under 5 years old | 4
(2)	Ages 5 – 19 | 28
(3)	Ages 20 – 24 | 9
(4)	Ages 25 – 59 | 105
(5)	Age 60 and Older | 174
(6)	Age unavailable | 0
Total number of consumers served by age | 320

Section F – Sex

Indicate the number of consumers in each category below.
| # of Consumers
(1)	Number of Females served | 200
(2)	Number of Males served | 120
Total number of consumers served by sex | 320

Section G – Race And Ethnicity

Indicate the number of consumers served in each category below.  Each consumer may be counted under ONLY ONE of the following categories in the 704 Report, even if the consumer reported more than one race and/or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity).

This section reflects a new OMB directive.  
Please refer to the Instructions before completing.
| # of Consumers
(1) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4
(2) Asian | 9
(3) Black or African American | 40
(4) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 2
(5) White | 196
(6) Hispanic/Latino of any race or Hispanic/ Latino only | 47
(7) Two or more races | 10
(8) Race and ethnicity unknown | 12
Total number of consumers served by race/ethnicity | 320

Section H – Disability

Indicate the number of consumers in each category below.
| # of Consumers
(1)	Cognitive | 3
(2)	Mental/Emotional | 0
(3)	Physical | 268
(4)	Hearing | 18
(5)	Vision | 20
(6)	Multiple Disabilities | 6
(7)	Other | 5
Total number of consumers served by disability | 320

SubPart III – Individual Services and Achievements funded through Title VII, Chapter 1, part B funds
Sections 13 and 704(m)(4); 34 CFR 364.53; Government Performance Results Act (GPRA) Performance Measures

Subpart III contains new data requests.  Please refer to the Instructions before completing.

Section A – Individual Services and Achievements

For the reporting year, indicate in the chart below how many consumers requested and received each of the following IL services.  Include all consumers who were provided services during the reporting year through Part B funds, either directly by DSU staff or via grants or contracts with other providers.  Do not include consumers who were served by any centers that received Part C funds during the reporting year.

Services

Consumers Requesting
Services

Consumers Receiving Services

(A) Advocacy/Legal Services | 0 | 0
(B) Assistive Technology | 140 | 38
(C) Children’s Services | 0 | 0
(D) Communication Services | 16 | 4
(E) Counseling and Related Services | 0 | 0
(F) Family Services | 0 | 0
(G) Housing, Home Modifications, and Shelter Services | 204 | 72
(H) IL Skills Training and Life Skills Training | 0 | 0
(I) Information and Referral Services | 100 | 63
(J) Mental Restoration Services | 0 | 0
(K) Mobility Training | 0 | 0
(L) Peer Counseling Services | 0 | 0
(M) Personal Assistance Services | 0 | 0
(N) Physical Restoration Services | 0 | 0
(O) Preventive Services | 76 | 44
(P) Prostheses, Orthotics, and Other Appliances | 2 | 0
(Q) Recreational Services | 0 | 0
(R) Rehabilitation Technology Services | 0 | 0
(S) Therapeutic Treatment | 0 | 0
(T) Transportation Services | 115 | 22
(U) Youth/Transition Services | 0 | 0
(V) Vocational Services | 0 | 0
(W) Other Services | 0 | 0
Totals | 653 | 243

Section B – Increased Independence and Community Integration

Item 1 – Goals Related to Increased Independence in a Significant Life Area

Indicate the number of consumers who set goals related to the following significant life areas, the number whose goals are still in progress, and the number who achieved their goals as a result of the provision of IL services.
Significant Life Area | Goals Set | Goals Achieved | In Progress
(A)	Self-Advocacy/Self-Empowerment | 0 | 0 | 0
(B)	Communication | 59 | 19 | 35
(C)	Mobility/Transportation | 164 | 30 | 115
(D)	Community-Based Living | 175 | 74 | 86
(E)	Educational | 0 | 0 | 0
(F)	Vocational | 0 | 0 | 0
(G)	Self-care | 347 | 124 | 197
(H)	Information Access/Technology | 10 | 2 | 6
(I)	Personal Resource Management | 0 | 0 | 0
(J)	Relocation from a Nursing Home or Institution to Community-Based Living | 0 | 0 | 0
(K)	Community/Social Participation | 0 | 0 | 0
(L)	 Other | 0 | 0 | 0

Item 2 – Improved Access To Transportation, Health Care and Assistive Technology 

(A)	Table

In column one, indicate the number of consumers who required access to previously unavailable transportation, health care services, or assistive technology during the reporting year.  Of the consumers listed in column one, indicate in column two, the number of consumers who, as a result of the provision of IL services (including the four core services), achieved access to previously unavailable transportation, health care services, or assistive technology during the reporting year.   In column three, list the number of consumers whose access to transportation, health care services or assistive technology is still in progress at the end of the reporting year.  

Areas | # of Consumers Requiring Access | # of Consumers Achieving Access | # of Consumers Whose Access is in Progress
(A)	Transportation | 115 | 22 | 69
(B)	Health Care Services | 0 | 0 | 0
(C)	Assistive Technology | 140 | 38 | 65

Note: For most IL services, a consumer’s access to previously unavailable transportation, health care and assistive technology is documented through his or her CSR.  In some instances, consumers may achieve an outcome solely through information and referral (I&R) services.  To document these instances as successful outcomes, providers are not required to create CSRs for these consumers but must be able to document that follow-up contacts with these consumers showed access to previously unavailable transportation, health care and assistive technology.

(B) I&R Information 

To inform RSA how many service providers engage in I&R follow-up contacts regarding access to transportation, health care services or assistive technology, please indicate the following:

The service provider did    / did not X engage in follow-up contacts with I & R recipients to document access gained to previously unavailable transportation, health care or assistive technology.

Section C – Additional Information Concerning Individual Services or Achievements
 
Please provide any additional description or explanation concerning individual services or achievements reported in subpart III, including outstanding success stories and/or major obstacles encountered. 

State IL Program: The NVSILC provides partial funding for the statewide Assistive Technology for Independent Living (AT/IL) program.  The information highlighted are important aspects of the program and successful outcomes for the consumer.  Program services support necessary daily living areas where assistive technology can remove barriers and increase independence for the individual.  The AT/IL program utilizes two additional funding sources including Assistive Technology Act funds and state appropriated funding.  The state dollars are utilized for the purchase of Assistive Technology (AT) if the consumer has no other resources available.  The AT/IL program is part of, and works closely with, the other Nevada Assistive Technology Collaborative programs.  Whenever possible the program coordinates with consumers to ensure informed choice is possible in the selection of AT by providing AT demonstrations, loaning of AT for trial, and access to gently used AT. Promoting successful AT selection with a consumer choice focus is helps to lessen abandonment of AT by the individual user.
                
                The AT/IL program prioritizes resources in efforts to prevent institutionalization and support community living.   Goals and services that may prevent or help someone transition from a care facility must be prioritized.  Transition services also includes non-AT services such as rental deposits, food, and items necessary to live until they are able to receive their income again, up to 30 days.  This year there were 52 Consumers, with a total of 96 Independent Living Goals, that were directly related to either a Transition or a Prevention of needing institutional care.  Of the Goals set 76 were Prevention related and 20 were Transition related.  Of these 56 goals were closed as Goal Met; 24 are in Progress.  
                
                All consumers are surveyed following closure with the AT/IL program.  The survey includes satisfaction and life impact questions as well as a question about choice and control.  This year there was a 56.8% voluntary return rate of surveys from consumers.  The following are the results for the consumer surveys where at least one goal was accomplished:
                
                Are you satisfied with our services?  Rate the service provided by the staff: 
                Excellent 		85% 
                Very Good      	11% 
                Good 		0% 
                Fair 			4% 
                Poor 			0% 
                
                Did you have choice and control over the Goals you set and the types of services you received? 
                A lot of control and choice 		68% 
                Quite a bit of control and choice 	22% 
                A little control and choice 		6% 
                Not enough control and choice 	4% 
                
                Rate your overall satisfaction with the program:  Which of the following best reflects your level of satisfaction with the services you received? 
                Very Satisfied 		81% 
                Mostly Satisfied 		15% 
                Somewhat Satisfied 	0% 
                Not Satisfied 		4% 
                
                Have the services provided made a positive impact on your life? 
                Yes 		94% 
                No 		6% 
                
                Did the services provided impact your life?  My overall quality of life: 
                Improved a lot 				76% 
                Improved quite a bit 			15% 
                Improved a little 				8% 
                Did not change 				1% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	0% 
                aEf
                My overall Independence related to the goals established: 
                Improved a lot 				61%
                Improved quite a bit 			23%
                Improved a little 				10%
                Did not change 				5%
                Not Applicable or No response 	1%
                
                My chances of staying OUT of a nursing home: 
                Improved a lot 				53% 
                Improved quite a bit 			21% 
                Improved a little 				3% 
                Did not change 				5% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	18% 
                
                How often are the devices or modifications used? 
                Daily 						91% 
                Weekly 					9% 
                Monthly 					0% 
                At least every 3 months 		0% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	0% 
                
                Do you think the government should continue funding this program? 
                Yes 		100% 
                No 		0%
                
                My ability to volunteer, be involved in my community, or do leisure activities: 
                Improved a lot 				24% 
                Improved quite a bit 			26% 
                Improved a little 				13% 
                Did not change 				26%
                Not Applicable or No response 	11%
                
                Rate the services provided by the vendors, building contractors, or businesses that you worked with: 
                Excellent 		82% 
                Very Good 		14% 
                Good 		2% 
                Fair 			2% 
                Poor 			0% 

subpart Iv – community Activities AND Coordination
Section 704(i), (l), and (m)(4) of the Act; 34 CFR 364.26, 364.27, and 364.32

Section A – Community Activities 

Item 1 – Community Activities Table

In the table below, summarize the community activities involving the DSU, SILC and CILs in the Statewide Network of Centers (excluding Part C fund recipients) during the reporting year.  For each activity, identify the primary disability issue(s) addressed as well as the type of activity conducted.  Indicate the entity(ies) primarily involved and the time spent.  Describe the primary objective(s) and outcome(s) for each activity.  Add more rows as necessary. 

Subpart IV contains new data requests.  Please refer to the Instructions before completing.

Issue Area | Activity Type | Primary Entity | Hours Spent | Objective(s) | Outcomes(s)
Increasing Awareness of IL | Community Education and Outreach Efforts | SILC/YAC | 25.00 | Promote SILC, Youth Action Council (YAC) and IL to locals at Disability Awareness Events Statewide. | Education and Awareness of IL
Increasing Awareness of IL | Community Education and Outreach Efforts | SILC | 16.00 | Presented information about IL and increased partnerships at the Self Advocacy Conference. | Networking for IL referrals, presented to IDD population.
Increasing Availability/Access to Assistive Technology | Outreach Efforts | DSE/CARE Chest | 24.00 | Increase consumer access | 8 Statewide community and senior centers with 83 contacts, provided IL program information as well as other CARE Chest program information
Increasing Availability/Access to Assistive Technology | Outreach Efforts | DSE/CARE Chest | 41.00 | Increase consumer access | 11 Statewide community events with 1,095 contacts, provided IL program information as well as other CARE Chest program information
Increasing Availability/Access to Assistive Technology | Outreach Efforts | DSE/CARE Chest | 8.00 | Increase Consumer Access | 9 hospital/clinic/rehabilitation centers with 125 contacts, provided IL program information as well as other CARE Chest program information
Increasing Availability/Access to Assistive Technology | Collaboration/Networking | DSE/CARE Chest | 3.00 | Increase consumer access | Tribal community with 30 contacts, introduced IL program and CARE Chest to the group and participating agencies
Increasing Opportunities for Affordable, Accessible Housing Units | Collaboration/Networking | DSE/CARE Chest | 29.00 | Increase consumer access | 7 Statewide organizations with 179 contacts, provided IL program information as well as other CARE Chest program information
Increasing Availability/Access to Assistive Technology | Outreach Efforts | DSE/CARE Chest | 8.00 | Increase consumer access | Rural health and human services agency, provided IL Program information as well as other CARE Chest program information

Item 2 – Description of Community Activities

For the community activities mentioned above, provide any additional details such as the role of the DSU, SILC, CIL, and/or consumers, names of any partner organizations and further descriptions of the specific activities, services and benefits.

For the community activities mentioned above, provide any additional details such as the role of the DSU, SILC, CIL, and/or consumers, names of any partner organizations and further descriptions of the specific activities, services and benefits.
                
                The SILC and Youth Action Council attended Disability Awareness Day and Pumpkinpaloosa events to educate the public about IL and collect data with our consumer survey. The SILC also collaborated with the Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities to support the Silver State Self-Advocacy Conference; we presented on IL and the IL Network/history and provided education and outreach during the entire event at a vendor table.
                The DSE provides the community activities mentioned through grants in an open-competitive process.  Grantees provided outreach and education of program services.  Outreach and education are targeted for unserved and underserved populations.  
                Activities by CARE Chest and DSE also included:
                State IL Program: The NVSILC provides partial funding for the statewide Assistive Technology for Independent Living (AT/IL) program.  The information highlighted are important aspects of the program and successful outcomes for the consumer.  Program services support necessary daily living areas where assistive technology can remove barriers and increase independence for the individual.  The AT/IL program utilizes two additional funding sources including Assistive Technology Act funds and state appropriated funding.  The state dollars are utilized for the purchase of Assistive Technology (AT) if the consumer has no other resources available.  The AT/IL program is part of, and works closely with, the other Nevada Assistive Technology Collaborative programs.  Whenever possible the program coordinates with consumers to ensure informed choice is possible in the selection of AT by providing AT demonstrations, loaning of AT for trial, and access to gently used AT. Promoting successful AT selection with a consumer choice focus is helps to lessen abandonment of AT by the individual user.
                
                The AT/IL program prioritizes resources in efforts to prevent institutionalization and support community living.   Goals and services that may prevent or help someone transition from a care facility must be prioritized.  Transition services also includes non-AT services such as rental deposits, food, and items necessary to live until they are able to receive their income again, up to 30 days.  This year there were 52 Consumers, with a total of 96 Independent Living Goals, that were directly related to either a Transition or a Prevention of needing institutional care.  Of the Goals set 76 were Prevention related and 20 were Transition related.  Of these 56 goals were closed as Goal Met; 24 are in Progress.  
                
                All consumers are surveyed following closure with the AT/IL program.  The survey includes satisfaction and life impact questions as well as a question about choice and control.  This year there was a 56.8% voluntary return rate of surveys from consumers.  The following are the results for the consumer surveys where at least one goal was accomplished:
                aEf
                Are you satisfied with our services?  Rate the service provided by the staff: 
                Excellent 		85% 
                Very Good      	11% 
                Good 		0% 
                Fair 			4% 
                Poor 			0% 
                
                Did you have choice and control over the Goals you set and the types of services you received? 
                A lot of control and choice 		68% 
                Quite a bit of control and choice 	22% 
                A little control and choice 		6% 
                Not enough control and choice 	4% 
                
                Rate your overall satisfaction with the program:  Which of the following best reflects your level of satisfaction with the services you received? 
                Very Satisfied 		81% 
                Mostly Satisfied 		15% 
                Somewhat Satisfied 	0% 
                Not Satisfied 		4% 
                
                Have the services provided made a positive impact on your life? 
                Yes 		94% 
                No 		6% 
                
                Did the services provided impact your life?  My overall quality of life: 
                Improved a lot 				76% 
                Improved quite a bit 			15% 
                Improved a little 				8% 
                Did not change 				1% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	0% 
                aEf
                My overall Independence related to the goals established: 
                Improved a lot 				61%
                Improved quite a bit 			23%
                Improved a little 				10%
                Did not change 				5%
                Not Applicable or No response 	1%
                
                My chances of staying OUT of a nursing home: 
                Improved a lot 				53% 
                Improved quite a bit 			21% 
                Improved a little 				3% 
                Did not change 				5% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	18% 
                
                How often are the devices or modifications used? 
                Daily 						91% 
                Weekly 					9% 
                Monthly 					0% 
                At least every 3 months 		0% 
                Not Applicable or No response 	0% 
                
                Do you think the government should continue funding this program? 
                Yes 		100% 
                No 		0%
                
                My ability to volunteer, be involved in my community, or do leisure activities: 
                Improved a lot 				24% 
                Improved quite a bit 			26% 
                Improved a little 				13% 
                Did not change 				26%
                Not Applicable or No response 	11%
                
                Rate the services provided by the vendors, building contractors, or businesses that you worked with: 
                Excellent 		82% 
                Very Good 		14% 
                Good 		2% 
                Fair 			2% 
                Poor 			0%

Section B – Working Relationships Among Various Entities

Describe DSU and SILC activities to maximize the cooperation, coordination, and working relationships among the independent living program, the SILC, and CILs; and the DSU, other state agencies represented on the SILC, other councils that address the needs of specific disability populations and issues, and other public and private entities.  Describe the expected or actual outcomes of these activities.

SILC has members who attend sister board meetings to keep communication lines open. The Executive Director attends meetings held by The Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities, The Commission on Aging, The Commission on Services for Persons with Disabilities and various mental health coalitions and councils throughout the State. Victoria Essner, an ex-officio member of SILC from VR, is also a member of the Assistive Technology Council. A new SILC member, Obioma Officer is Executive Director of the Deaf Commission. Our member, Raquel O'Neil is the Chair of the Nevada State Rehabilitation Council. Renee Portnell is a past member of the Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities. These relationships have served to inform others in the disability community about SILC and inform SILC regarding other entity efforts throughout the State.
                The SILC, with other disability councils and commissions are collaborating to provide consumer testimony or important education and information that impacts the disability community to State agencies, advocacy organizations and legislators or legislative committees.

SUBPart V – Statewide Independent Living Council (SILC) 
Section 705 of the Act; 34 CFR 364.21       

Section A - Composition and Appointment

Item 1 – Current SILC Composition

In the chart below, provide the requested information for each SILC member.  The category in which the member was appointed can be described, for example, as ex-officio state agency representative, other state agency representative, center representative, person with a disability not employed by a center or state agency, section 121 funded project director, parent of person with a disability, community advocate, other service provider, etc.  Include current vacancies, along with the corresponding appointment category for each.  Add more rows as necessary.

Name of SILC member | Employed by         CIL, State Agency or Neither | Appointment Category | Voting or Non-Voting | Term Start Date | Term End Date
Mary Evilsizer | CIL | CIL ED | Voting | 08/31/2021 | 08/31/2024
Cheyenne Pasquale | State Agency | DSE Representative | Non-Voting | 05/01/2020 | 04/30/2023
Jennifer Kane | State Agency | Ex-officio | Non-Voting | 08/31/2021 | 08/31/2024
Obioma Officer | State Agency | Ex-officio | Non-Voting | 08/01/2022 | 07/31/2025
Victoria Essner | State Agency | Ex-officio | Non-Voting | 08/30/2021 | 08/31/2024
Diane Trusty-Foremaster (DeeDee) | Neither | PWD | Voting | 06/01/2021 | 05/31/2024
Havander Davis | Neither | PWD | Voting | 11/01/2020 | 10/31/2023
Julie Weissman-Steinbaugh | Neither | PWD | Voting | 04/01/2021 | 03/31/2024
Kate Osti | Neither | PWD | Voting | 11/01/2020 | 10/31/2023
Linda Vejvoda | Neither | PWD | Voting | 08/01/2022 | 07/31/2025
Patricia Unruh (aka: Ace Patrick) | Neither | PWD | Voting | 01/02/2022 | 01/01/2025
Raquel O'Neil | Neither | PWD | Voting | 04/01/2021 | 03/31/2024
Renee Portnell | Neither | PWD | Voting | 05/01/2020 | 04/30/2023
Sabra McWhirter | Neither | PWD | Voting | 11/01/2020 | 10/31/2023

Item 2 – SILC Composition Requirements

Please provide the information requested in the chart below.  Include any current vacancies in a particular appointment category.

SILC Composition | # of SILC members
(A)	How many members are on the SILC? | 14
(B)	How many members of the SILC are individuals with disabilities not employed by a state agency or a center for independent living? | 9
(C)	How many members of the SILC are voting members? | 10
(D)	How many of the voting members of the SILC are individuals with disabilities not employed by a state agency or a center for independent living? | 9

Section B – SILC Membership Qualifications
Section 705(b)(4) of the Act; 34 CFR 364.21(c)

Item 1 – Statewide Representation

Describe how the SILC is composed of members who provide statewide representation.

The State of Nevada is geographically split into two main regions: North and South. Members that represent the North include: Patricia Unruh, DeeDee Foremaster, Linda Vejvoda and Renee Portnell. Members that represent the South, our most populated region, include: Sabra McWhirter, Kate Osti, Raquel O'Neil, Julie Weissman-Steinbaugh and Havander Davis. The ex-officios represent Statewide access to affiliate programs and agencies. While Nevada has only 2 Part C centers that represent each region, respectively, only one can be a member during their required terms. 

Item 2 – Broad Range of Individuals with Disabilities from Diverse Backgrounds

Describe how the SILC members represent a broad range of individuals with disabilities from diverse backgrounds.  

Patricia Unruh identifies herself as a person with the following disabilities: vision, hearing, developmental, neurological and physical, as well as aged. She is also a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Havander Davis identifies as a person with the following disabilities: vision. He is also a person of color living in an urban area. Lynda Tourloukis has physical and developmental disabilities and advocates for individuals with disablities in the Carson City area. Kate Osti identifies as an individual with the following disabilities: vision and physical. She is currently an advocate in the disability legal community that provides legal aid and advocacy across the state. Sabra McWhirter identifies as a person with an invisible disability and works as an advocate in the disability community. Obioma Officer identifies as a person with a hearing disability and is the current Executive Director of the Nevada Commission for People who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing. She is also African-American. Non-voting member, Essner, represents the State's Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation, which is the State partner charged with helping Nevadan's with disabilities achieve employment. The Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation is a statewide agency, with 13 offices statewide, including offices in the following rural communities: Winnemucca, Fallon, Elko and Ely.  Each office is staffed with a qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor and technician to meet the needs of Nevadan's with disabilities in their community. Each office, to the best of its geographic ability, partners with the local Center for Independent Living. Renee Portnell identifies as a person with learning and physical disabilities. She lives in northern Nevada and is the parent of a child with an intellectual and developmental disability (IDD). Non-voting member, Kane, is an Educational Programs Professional (EPP) for the Office of Special Education, works with all 17 school districts in the state as well as the State Charter School Authority. Providing technical assistance in all aspects of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) to all districts including rural districts. Her work is primarily around IEP development, compliance, and dispute resolution, but other EPPS work with districts to include transition. Cheyenne Pasquale is the Chief of Planning in the Planning, Advocacy and Community Service Unit of Aging and Disability Services Division. Dawn Lyons is the Executive Director of SILC and identifies as a person with brain injuries, learning disabilities and a developmental disability and having Native American and Hispanic ethnicity. She also is a parent of two adult children with disabilities. Raquel O'Neil is the Director of Blind Connect and the Chair of the Rehabilitation Council. She is also a blind individual and advocate. Julie Weissman-Steinbaugh is a person with CP who recently moved to Nevada. She was previously the owner of a supported living agency in California and is a University of California, Berkeley graduate.
                We are working on recruiting others who can bring more racial and ethnic diversity to our council. We also have several guests and partners who contribute to our subcommittees and State Plan development who are individuals with various disabilities residing all over the State, also representing the BIPOC (black, indigenous persons of color) communities.  

Item 3 – Knowledgeable about IL

Describe how SILC members are knowledgeable about centers for independent living and independent living services. 

Three of our members utilize CIL services. Seven members work for partner agencies or partner with the CIL's. The SILC has an onboarding process that includes education and training about the IL network and philosophy and the difference between SILC and CIL's. The CIL's report activities and share stories during SILC meetings that help SILC members understand their role better, as well. The CIL's have provided training to SILC regarding the CIL role and responsibilities, including the complaint process (CAP) and internal structure. 

Section C – SILC Staffing and Support

Item 1 – SILC Staff

Please provide the name and contact information for the SILC executive director.  Indicate the number and titles of any other SILC staff, if applicable.  Also indicate whether any SILC staff is also a state agency employee.

 Dawn Lyons, Executive Director, NVSILC-ADSD/State employee title: Social Services Program Specialist II
                P.O. Box 33386, Las Vegas, NV 89133
                (702) 757-7990  dlyons@adsd.nv.gov 
                
                Wendy Thornley, Administrative Assistant III, ADSD/State employee
                3416 Goni Road Suite D  Carson City, NV 89706
                T: (775) 687-0551  E: wthornley@adsd.nv.gov 
                
                Cody Butler, Youth Leader, Youth Action Council (YAC) / State Contractor title: Program Officer I
                3416 Goni Road Suite D  Carson City, NV 89706  
                T: (775) 813-2351  E: CodyButler@adsd.nv.gov  

Item 2 – SILC Support

Describe the administrative support services provided by the DSU, if any.

The DSE administers the State IL services program (AT/IL) and supports the SILC's financial contracts and infrastructure. The DSE manages the receipt of funds from ACL and the necessary financial reporting.  

Section D – SILC Duties
Section 705(c); 34 CFR 364.21(g)

Item 1 – SILC Duties

Provide a summary of SILC activities conducted during the reporting year related to the SILC’s duties listed below:

(A) State Plan Development

Describe any activities related to the joint development of the state plan.  Include any activities in preparation for developing the state plan, such as needs assessments, evaluations of consumer satisfaction, hearings and forums.  

A Statewide consumer survey was developed to start gathering consumer data starting in fiscal year 22 (FY22). The new survey was improved from the previous survey to be easier to complete with more easily reviewed responses and better-defined multiple-choice options. The survey results will be analyzed and shared publicly at the end of FY22 in preparation of creating a new SPIL. The SILC attempted to collaborate with the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) and the Gwinn Center (a Northern Nevada non-profit organization serving the IDD population) to collect data across IL Networks Nationwide in order to determine the best IL Network Model; however, the Gwinn Center stated the data would be impossible to collect and UNR deferred to the Gwinn Center. So, NV SILC will collect as much of this data next year and do their analysis alone. Colorado IL Network has been generous in sharing Employment First data and working with Nevada to align services with Colorado models. Nevada received federal infrastructure dollars for housing initiatives and SILC is asking for presentations by local grantees of those funds and to provide education regarding accessibility. 

(B) Monitor, Review and Evaluate the Implementation of the State Plan

Describe any activities related to the monitoring, review and evaluation of the implementation of the state plan.

Implementation of Statewide disability services data has been an ongoing challenge. Providers do not share data and are unwilling to collaborate on data initiatives. We are disappointed in the lack of participation Statewide. The reports we have received helped SILC coordinate activities based on the most current IL data. 

(C) Coordination With Other Disability Councils

Describe the SILC’s coordination of activities with the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC) established under section 105, if the state has such a Council, or the commission described in section 101(a)(21)(A), if the state has such a commission, and councils that address the needs of specific disability populations and issues under other Federal law.  Please state whether the SILC has at least one representative serving as a member of the SRC and whether the SILC has any members serving on other councils, boards or commissions in the state. 

Nevada State Rehabilitation Council (NSRC)- Raquel O'Neil, Chair of NSRC reports activity to SILC quarterly and collaborates on employment issues.
                Commission on Services for Persons with Disabilities (CSPD)- Cindi Swanson is a member of CSPD and works with SILC and other partners as an advocate in the community. SILC meets with Cindi regularly to coordinate efforts.
                Commission for Persons Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (Deaf Commission)- Obioma Officer is the Executive Director and shares Commission news.
                Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities (DD Council)- Renee Portnell is a former member of the DD Council who shares news with both entities. Dawn Lyons, ED of NV SILC attends various DD Council meetings, as well.
                Assistive Technology Council (AT Council)- Victoria Essner is a member of both SILC and the AT Council and shares information.
                The Executive Director of SILC also attends the following council and commission meetings: PAIMI, Clark County Children's Mental Health Coalition, Southern Nevada Mental Health Coalition, Intra-agency Coordinating Council (of Early Intervention), Commission on Autism Spectrum Disorders Workforce Subcommittee, Commission on Aging, CSPD, NSRC, Deaf Commission, AT Council and various Legislative Interim Committees. 

(D) Public Meeting Requirements

Describe how the SILC has ensured that all regularly scheduled meetings and other public hearings and forums hosted by the SILC are open to the public and sufficient advance notice is provided.

Nevada has a very strong public meeting law which requires that every agenda be reviewed by the Attorney General's office before posting, and that sufficient notice be given prior to the meeting. All meeting notices are widely posted and interested parties (non-SILC members) are notified by e-mail of upcoming meetings. Every meeting includes at least two opportunities for open public comment. 

Item 2 – Other Activities

Describe any other SILC activities funded by non-Part B funds.

N/A

Section E – Training and Technical Assistance Needs 
Section 721(b)(3) of the Act 

Please identify the SILC’s training and technical assistance needs.   The needs identified in this chart will guide the priorities set by RSA for the training and technical assistance provided to CILs and SILCs. 

Training and Technical Assistance Needs

Choose up to 10 Priority Needs — 
Rate items 1-10 with 1 being most important

Advocacy/Leadership Development |
General Overview |
Community/Grassroots Organizing |
Individual Empowerment |
Systems Advocacy |
Legislative Process |
Applicable Laws |
General overview and promulgation of various disability laws |
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Air-Carrier’s Access Act |
Fair Housing Act | 10
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act |
Medicaid/Medicare/PAS/waivers/long-term care |
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended |
Social Security Act |
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 |
Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 | ``
Government Performance Results Act of 1993 |
Assistive Technologies |
General Overview |
Data Collecting and Reporting |
General Overview |
704 Reports |
Performance Measures contained in 704 Report |
Dual Reporting Requirements |
Case Service Record Documentation |
Disability Awareness and Information |
Specific Issues |
Evaluation |
General Overview |
CIL Standards and Indicators |
Community Needs Assessment |
Consumer Satisfaction Surveys |
Focus Groups |
Outcome Measures |
Financial:  Grant Management |
General Overview |
Federal Regulations |
Budgeting |
Fund Accounting |
Financial:  Resource Development |
General Overview |
Diversification of Funding Base | 2
Fee-for-Service Approaches |
For Profit Subsidiaries |
Fund-Raising Events of Statewide Campaigns | 1
Grant Writing |
Independent Living Philosophy |
General Overview |
Innovative Programs |
Best Practices |
Specific Examples | 3
Management Information Systems |
Computer Skills |
Software |
Marketing and Public Relations |
General Overview |
Presentation/Workshop Skills |
Community Awareness | 4
Networking Strategies |
General Overview |
Electronic |
Among CILs & SILCs |
Community Partners | 5
Program Planning |
General Overview of Program Management and Staff Development | 6
CIL Executive Directorship Skills Building |
Conflict Management and Alternative Dispute Resolution |
First-Line CIL Supervisor Skills Building |
IL Skills Modules |
Peer Mentoring |
Program Design |
Time Management |
Team Building | 7
Outreach to Unserved/Underserved Populations |
General Overview |
Disability |
Minority |
Institutionalized Potential Consumers |
Rural | 8
Urban |
SILC Roles/Relationship to CILs |
General Overview |
Development of State Plan for Independent Living |
Implementation (monitor & review) of SPIL |
Public Meetings |
Role and Responsibilities of Executive Board |
Role and Responsibilities of General Members |
Collaborations with In-State Stakeholders |
CIL Board of Directors |
General Overview |
Roles and Responsibilities |
Policy Development |
Recruiting/Increasing Involvement | 9
Volunteer Programs |
General Overview |
Optional Areas and/or Comments (write-in) |

SubPart VI – SPIL Comparison and updates, Other Accomplishments and Challenges of the Reporting Year
Section 704(m)(4) of the Act; 34 CFR 76.140

Section A – Comparison of Reporting Year Activities with the SPIL

Item 1 – Progress in Achieving Objectives and Goals

Describe progress made in achieving the objectives and goals outlined in the most recently approved SPIL. Discuss goals achieved and/or in progress as well as barriers encountered.

Objective 1A: Providers of Part B-funded, high-need or new IL services will report an increase in consumers served, as measured each quarter for the fiscal year (October 1st through September 30th, 2021, 2022, and 2023).
                1A1. Provide $70,000 in support Federal Fiscal Year 21 (October 1-September 30), and $30,000 in Federal Fiscal Years 22 and 23 (October 1-September 30) for new community services and services with the highest need throughout the State using current data.   The SILC has provided funding for housing initiatives in rural Nevada, including for homeless and transition populations and has provided education and technical support to support RCIL.
                1A2. The SILC will fund at least one Part B competitive subgrant for services needed each year. - Grantees will provide the SILC with a quarterly report.    There was one competitive subaward given out by SILC in FY22 as listed above, and the remaining funding was awarded for extending our outreach.
                1A3. The SILC will provide ongoing support for the State-funded Independent Living Program that services all Nevada Counties. - IL Program Progress report will be shared quarterly or more often if services and/or service providers change.    SILC has provided the State IL Program funding to continue the AT/IL services using the IL Model and the Director of the program has given quarterly reports to the Council throughout FY22.
                
                Objective 1B: Increase the CILs' operating budget through Part B subawards by at least 4% during the October 1, 2022 and October 1, 2023 award periods.
                1B3. CILs will provide current quarterly reports to the SILC for all supported activities and for all other notable CIL activities throughout the year.    SNCIL has given SILC quarterly updates on consumer trends and current services throughout FY22. 
                1B4. The CILs will provide the SILC with current quarterly reports on requests for services from consumers so the SILC has valid and current network data on the needs for individuals with disabilities.    As stated above for 1B3 progress, SNCIL has provided general information about consumer requests and some data in FY21. 
                
                Objective 2A: SILC will increase number of consumers' IL awareness as measured in our annual consumer survey by September 30, 2023.
                2A1. The SILC will create a presentation that encompasses a unified IL message by September 30, 2021.  This was completed as scheduled and presented to multiple entities across the State, including the Silver State Self-Advocacy Conference.
                2A2. The SILC will provide this presentation to the network of partners by the end of September 30, 2022. Completed and presented multiple times to multiple partners as stated above.
                Objective 2B: SILC will increase accessibility for people with disabilities by November 3, 2023.
                2B1. SILC will collaborate to create an accessible NVEASE instructional video on the Secretary of State's web site by September 30, 2023. This was completed in FFY21 ahead of schedule in collaboration with the DD Council.
                2B2. The SILC will collaborate with community partners Statewide beginning October 1, 2020 regarding legislative issues for disability and IL philosophy advocacy, education and outreach.  This is an ongoing effort and NVSILC has been increasing the number of community partners and legislators we collaborate with, including participating in a legislative community disability forum intended to prioritize legislation in the upcoming 2022 session. We currently have a small workgroup from various partner organizations to collaborate on common initiatives.
                2B3. The SILC will establish formal collaborations with the Commission on Services for Persons with Disabilities (CSPD) and the Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities (DD Council) to address education and outreach regarding disability legislative issues, including, but not limited to competitive integrated employment in Nevada by September 30, 2021.   The SILC created a workgroup to address Integrated Employment in Nevada but have not received a response to our Subcommittee's letter of recommendation to the Governor. Our current workgroup consists of members of other councils and commissions, Vocational Rehabilitation, the AT Council, Rehab Council, DD Council, and a current Nevada legislator and educator from our higher education system.
                2B4. The IL Network will collaborate with community partners to facilitate a plan for disaster and emergency preparation statewide by September 30, 2022. A disaster and emergency preparation resource document was prepared by the IL Network and posted publicly on the SILC website. It references the most immediate resources for people with disabilities, specifically, and recommends each individual work with their CIL to create a personalized plan for their area. There are many emergency resources in Nevada; so, we scaled down options to a manageable, one-page, relevant list.
                Objective 2C: Develop a Statewide youth presence in the IL Network by September 30, 2023.
                2C1. The SILC will define youth membership in SILC policies by September 30, 2021.    Inasmuch as the Youth Action Council (YAC) has been established, the SILC has incorporated YAC into our policies. We continue to assess the ongoing need.
                2C2. The SILC will sponsor at least one youth to attend APRIL each year from the SILC's annual travel budget by September 30, 2021.    APRIL Conference was held virtually this year and SILC sponsored the Youth Leader to attend SILC Congress in FY22 and will promote APRIL and SILC Congress attendance the following year.
                
                Objective 2D: The SILC will use their new website to increase awareness of the IL Philosophy Statewide by September 30, 2023.
                2D1. The SILC website will have at least 10 partners listed by October 31, 2020 and will add at least two educational or resource links to the news feed each quarter.   SILC has added more than 10 partners by the anticipated date and continues to add partners and resources on an ongoing basis. We have customized our onboarding process with training resources listed for all members and are still working on obtaining a YouTube Premium account so we can create training videos that simplify our training requirements and open them to the public. The video production is delayed but will begin in FFY23.
                
                Objective 3A: SILC will improve our internal processes for SPIL evaluation.
                3A1. All conference attendees will relay training to the Council by July 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023 at each annual meeting.    An overview of conferences has been provided at SILC meetings after all conferences and trainings throughout FY22 without exception and SILC has even arranged additional training, outside of quarterly meetings to provide members with as much training as possible during FY22, including Colorado's Employment First presentation and Social Security Administration's presentation regarding SSDI vs. SSI benefits and retaining benefits while working.
                
                Objective 3B: A resource development plan will be completed and ready to be implemented by October 1, 2023.
                3B1. The Nevada SILC will compile a list of ideas to adopt based on feasibility (resource development plan) by September 30, 2022. This is ready to be written into the net SPIL.
                Objective 3C: The DSE will increase staff support time to 1.25 FTE that is fully selected, supervised and evaluated by the SILC by September 30, 2023.
                The DSE has relinquished control over staff for SILC and came to an agreement regarding financial support of SILC staff. SILC now has 2.25 FTE with DSE match funding contributing to the cost.
                3C1. The SILC Chair will supervise the 1.0 FTE Executive Director (ED) for assigned SILC duties beginning October 1, 2020.    SILC has established autonomy with a memorandum of understanding with the DSE and incorporated supervisory duties within our policy manual.
                3C2. The Executive Director will supervise support staff at .25 FTE for assigned SILC duties beginning October 1, 2020.    SILC policies now include designated supervision over staff 100% by the Executive Director of NV SILC.
                3C3. Staff acting in the role of Executive Director (ED) for the SILC will telecommute from outside the DSE office and will meet with at least four community partners by the end of each year.    Both the Executive Director and AAIII have moved to telecommuting full time due to the pandemic. Our Youth Leader began his position as a telecommuting position. All staff remain telecommuting for FY22. The Executive Director meets with at least one community partner monthly, exceeding our goal of at least four during each fiscal year. 

Item 2  – SPIL Information Updates

If applicable, describe any changes to the information contained in the SPIL that occurred during the reporting year, including the placement, legal status, membership or autonomy of the SILC; the SILC resource plan, the design of the statewide network of centers; and the DSU administration of the SILS program.

The SILC has acquired support staff time due to need. The Administrative Assistant III has taken on more programmatic responsibilities and provides training and mentorship to Northern members, partners, and stakeholders. The Executive Director is working on transitioning SILC to a 501c3 and incorporating more community involvement and administrative direction. The Youth Leader has recruited more Youth Action Council members and is being extensively trained in youth initiatives statewide. All of staff duties are continually increasing and becoming more complex as SILC's independence from the State becomes more accepted by stakeholders and the DSE. Therefore, the SILC has requested more staff time and changes in position classifications that are more aligned with responsibilities. 

Section B– Significant Activities and Accomplishments

If applicable, describe any significant activities and accomplishments achieved by the DSU and SILC not included elsewhere in the report, e.g. brief summaries of innovative practices, improved service delivery to consumers, etc.

SILC has established formal collaborations with the Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities regarding Integrated employment and self-advocacy initiatives. In August, SILC co-sponsored the Silver State Advocacy Conference in Las Vegas, both helping with the planning and providing IL training and resources to attendees. 

Section C – Substantial Challenges

If applicable, describe any substantial problems encountered by the DSU and SILC, not included elsewhere in this report, and discuss resolutions/attempted resolutions, e.g.,  difficulty in outreach efforts; disagreements between the SILC and the DSU; complications recruiting SILC members; complications working with other state agencies or organizations within the state.

The SILC and Youth Action Council have had similar issues with recruitment as last year due to the ongoing pandemic. Despite the difficulty, SILC was able to recruit 2 new members who have been appointed by the Governor and the Youth Action Council has been able to recruit 3 new members. So far, we have still been able to maintain quorum for public meetings.
                The SILC Data Hub was removed from our web page tabs and SILC had to contract a new website maintenance provider due to excessive billing. Unfortunately, the data hub could not be salvaged.
                SILC supported the Rural Center for Independent Living as they were providing much needed housing assistance during the pandemic; however, the need is greater than the availability and housing continues to be the biggest challenge for people with disabilities in Nevada. Despite all Nevada CILs aiding with housing, there are still few accessible and affordable housing solutions to be found. There are State Legislative initiatives that incentivize developers, though, and we have been reaching out to ensure new developers include affordable, accessible housing.
                Historically SILC has received feedback that Pahrump in Nye County is isolated from the rest of the State due to its geographical location. Lack of mental health supports is the second largest challenge for Nevadans according to SILC's most recent consumer satisfaction survey, and minimal transportation options make it difficult for people with disabilities living in Pahrump to access services. Pahrump is an area of our State that needs more focus in our next SPIL.
                Our Chair stepped down due to health reasons, although she did remain as a regular member, and SILC had to elect a new Chair and Vice Chair. Change in leadership always requires an adjustment period, but we are settling in and moving forward productively. We have also been adjusting our mentoring process since we are acquiring more members now but training the mentors to mentor others is time-consuming for us old-timers and is taking a bit more time than anticipated.
                We experienced a betrayal of trust with our DSE regarding the Public Health Workforce Funding, as well. They made plans for the Part B portion without consulting SILC. At the same time, we were being informed by ILRU about it and making plans for it, as well. The DSE told SILC we had no say since it was already decided by the DSE Administrator and then they neglected to sign the assurances to receive the funding at all. SILC was unhappy and wrote a letter to the DHHS Director, asking him to look into the behavior of our DSE. We had a formal talk with the Administrator, who assured us the DSE did not intentionally lose the opportunity for the funding and that they would try to do better in the future in regards to consulting the disability community and following Nevada Revised Statute 427A.040, which states, "   2.Ã¢E'Ã¢E'The Division shall:
                      (b)Ã¢E'Work with persons with disabilities, persons interested in matters relating to persons with disabilities and state and local governmental agencies in:
                             (1)Ã¢E'Developing and improving policies of this State concerning programs or services for persons with disabilities, including, without limitation, policies concerning the manner in which complaints relating to services provided pursuant to specific programs should be addressed;...
                  (g)Ã¢E'Before establishing policies or making decisions that will affect the lives of persons with disabilities, consult with persons with disabilities and members of the public in this State through the use of surveys, focus groups, hearings or councils of persons with disabilities to receive:
                             (1)Ã¢E'Meaningful input from persons with disabilities regarding the extent to which such persons are receiving services, including, without limitation, services described in their individual service plans, and their satisfaction with those services; and
                             (2)Ã¢E'Public input regarding the development, implementation and review of any programs or services for persons with disabilities." The SILC recommended the Director continue to monitor the DSE to ensure they follow Statute.
                
                Another issue we have been challenged with is that data on individuals with disabilities in Nevada is lacking and it doesn't seem to matter how or who we ask, we cannot obtain any additional data. The Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities has been able to obtain data on individuals with developmental disabilities in Nevada, but they receive more support from key State figures at this time. The SILC continues to work to garner the support we need to widen the scope of that data collection to ALL people with disabilities.
                
                One last issue SILC has had difficulty with is the severe lack of funding and support to promote Independent Living and collaborate with other organizations in a meaningful way. We receive Federal Part B funding only at this time, and struggle to support our only Part B compliant Center for Independent Living and maintain Council responsibilities along with creating a sustainable independence. We rely too heavily on the DSE for staffing, but still must pay more than our fair share of the staffing expenses. The DSE even denied supporting a small increase for staffing to be included in the ADSD budget; yet, promoted increases in staffing for many internal positions to the agency. Increases in wages to keep up with Council needs and economic growth has fallen upon the Council's resources alone. This is creating an even larger burden while increasing costs for all endeavors is the norm. 
                
Section D – Additional Information

Include any additional information, suggestions, comments or explanations not included elsewhere in the report.

The Rural Center for Independent Living (RCIL) worked with ILRU many years ago to be mentored into becoming 725 compliant. RCIL sent SILC their report for 2021 compliance in accordance with the Act and everything looked to be in order; however, due to the pandemic, we were unable to audit in-person to ensure their stated compliance. The Nevada SILC will be performing two separate audits of RCIL; one in November, 2022 and the other in November, 2023. If we find RCIL to be compliant with section 725, we will be including them as a Part B Center for Independent Living in the next State Plan for Independent Living. If they are not found to be in compliance with section 725, SILC will continue to support their efforts in the community as a partner organization to a lesser degree than if they are compliant, and will continue to support the underfunded Part C Centers in our State, as well. Either way, SILC plans to educate and promote more funding for Nevada CILs.

SubPART VII - signatures

Please sign and print the names, titles and telephone numbers of the DSU directors(s) and SILC chairperson.

Julie Weissman-Steinbaugh - Signed Digitally | 01/24/2023
SIGNATURE OF SILC CHAIRPERSON | DATE
Julie Weissman-Steinbaugh - Chairperson | (925) 899-4651

NAME AND TITLE OF SILC CHAIRPERSON

Dena Schmidt - Signed Digitally

PHONE NUMBER

02/01/2023

SIGNATURE OF DSU DIRECTOR | DATE
Dena Schmidt - Administrator | (775) 687-4210
NAME AND TITLE OF DSU DIRECTOR | PHONE NUMBER