The following data is from the Assistive Technology for Independent Living Program. The data is from October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. The total funding resources for the program cross over into two federal reporting years. The funding described below is on the states fiscal year which the programs operated from July 2019 through June 2020 was $1,559,544.28 Federal Part B SILC $140,000 was budgeted as approved by the NVSILC. Federal Assistive Technology $123,725 was budgeted. State funding specifically for the AT/IL Program $1,357,514.71 State ILG funding for 60 and over $161,803 The funding sources and amounts for the program partners are as follows. These funds are for operational costs such as personnel, fringe, office space, mileage and can include a maximum of 10% for administrative costs. Staff provide direct services to the consumers assisting them to identify their Independent Living Goals, barriers, solutions, options, resources, and the coordination of services with vendors or other parties involved. There an average of 5 FTE statewide. The following shows the budgeted amounts. Total operation budgets was $342,110.29. The majority of the state funding is used solely for direct services which are issued by an authorization to vendors and paid upon completion of the service which the consumer must sign off for them to be paid. 22% constitutes the operational costs and 78% for purchase of assistive technology services. Statewide call information for program services: Calls from a potential Consumer 268 Calls from a Consumers Representative 132 Calls from non-representative or without authority 76 Calls from an Agency or Organization 6 Calls having mixed criteria 6 Total Calls 488 Program Applicant Information (PIP) provided to 327 people. These are potential consumers that have identified that they want to develop Independent Living Goals and explore options, resources, and solutions. General Information Provided 7. General program information is provided to either pass onto a potential consumer or for a potential consumer that has not decided to participate yet. Referrals to Other Resources 361 Technical Assistance Provided 94 Calls Related to a Transition 15 Calls Related to a Prevention 27 The following is caseload information as of 9/30/2020: Consumer cases carried from the previous year 158 Consumers new during the fiscal year 180 Active Consumer Cases as of 9/30/2020 83 Waitlist as of 9/30/2020 111 There are 31 cases drafted and/or pending Consumer signature There were 28 cases with goals initiated but consumers decided to not move forward. This sections lists the Goals by type as well as the total number set and the total number met through this reports timeframe: Communication 84 Goals Set 32 Goals Met 44 Goals in progress 6 closed unable to contact or withdrawn 2 closed as passed away Mobility or Transportation 148 Goals Set 50 Goals Met 76 Goals in progress 17 closed unable to contact or withdrawn 2 closed as passed away Community Based Living 233 Goals Set 92 Goals Met 119 Goals in progress 18 closed unable to contact or withdrawn 3 closed as passed away Self-care 470 Goals Set 207 Goals Met 200 Goals in progress 48 closed unable to contact or withdrawn 8 closed as passed away 7 closed as no solution available Information and Access to Technology 20 Goals Set 9 Goals Met 7 Goals in progress 4 closed unable to contact or withdrawn Transition from a care facility 1 Goals Set 1 closed unable to contact or withdrawn Other 2 Goals Set 2 Goal in progres Goals Prioritized as Relocation 43 Goals Prioritized as Prevention 117 Consumer Goals according to status for all cases open through the reporting period: Goals Met 393 at 41% Goals In Progress 446 at 47% Goals Withdrawn or Unable to Contact 93 at 10% Goals Passed Away 15 at 2% Goals Solution not available 8 at 1% Total Goals Set 955 at 100% Closure Reason by total and percentage Closed Goals Met 108 at 75% Closed Withdrawn 20 at 14% Closed Died 7 at 5% Closed Moved or Other 9 at 6% Total Closed Cases 144 at 100% Satisfaction and Life Impact Survey Data for this reporting period has a 55.3% response rate from consumers: Are you satisfied with our services? Rate the service provided by the staff at CARE Chest or Easterseals: Excellent 89% Very Good 8% Good 4% Fair 0% Poor 0% Did you have choice and control over the Goals you set and the types of services you received? A lot of control and choice 67% Quite a bit of control and choice 33% A little control and choice 0% Not enough control and choice 0% Rate the services provided by the vendors, building contractors, or businesses that you worked with: Excellent 82% Very Good 14% Good 4% Fair 0% Poor 0% Rate your overall satisfaction with the program: Which of the following best reflects your level of satisfaction with the services you received? Very Satisfied 84% Mostly Satisfied 14% Somewhat Satisfied 1% Not Satisfied 2% Have the services provided made a positive impact on your life? Yes 100% No 0% Did the services provided impact your life? My overall quality of life: Improved a lot 76% Improved quite a bit 19% Improved a little 4% Did not change 0% Not Applicable or No response 2% My ability to volunteer, be involved in my community, or do leisure activities: Improved a lot 38% Improved quite a bit 28% Improved a little 8% Did not change 10% Not Applicable or No response 17% My overall Independence related to the goals established: Improved a lot 67% Improved quite a bit 21% Improved a little 0% Did not change 2% Not Applicable or No response 10% My chances of staying OUT of a nursing home: Improved a lot 58% Improved quite a bit 21% Improved a little 0% Did not change 1.9% Not Applicable or No response 19% How often are the devices or modifications used? Daily 85% Weekly 8% Monthly 0% At least every 3 months 0% Not Applicable or No response 8% Do you think the government should continue funding this program? Yes 100% No 0% Are you registered to vote or interested in being registered? Registered 77% Interested 4% Not Interested 10%